Now that knowledge management has evolved
from its early days as a special initiative or stand-alone project,
it is increasingly integrated into organizations operational processes.
Many KM software tools launched in the last few years provide a
varied and powerful palette an organization can choose from. However,
it is increasingly hard to understand what these tools really do
and even harder to evaluate which offer the best choices to solve
the problems at hand. What we do is present a framework for analyzing
and comparing knowledge management tools, focusing on two major
dimensions: knowledge structure and knowledge services. Our proposed
framework is then applied to analyze a number of current tools and
shows how to use it to find the right tool for your problem.
It is crucial to view the emerging communications
revolution and its impact on how we exchange information within
the framework of the world's current and uncertain business, political
and economic environment.
Information architects design search and navigation systems to
power the user experience. Content managers integrate tools and
processes to drive the publisher experience. Both of these interrelated
disciplines are concerned with content definition, quality, structure
and metadata. Through case studies and examples drawn from some
of the world’s leading organization, our demo’s and
theories shows how information architecture and content management
are connected by common business goals, strategies, practices,
and governance models. We explore the similarities between XML
schema
and navigation and the role that content management system such
as Documentum, Vingette, Microsoft CMS, Interwoven and Plumtree
play in defining solutions for access and personalization. |